- The football community is rallying behind the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) Appeals Committee following the controversial two-year suspension of Coach Alloy Ulor by the Cross River State Football Association (CRSFA), a decision many view with suspicion.
Coach Ulor, who manages May & Frank FC, was recently banned over allegations of match-fixing and game manipulation. However, the timing and context of the decision have led to widespread criticism and questions about the motives behind the move.
At the center of the controversy is CRSFA Secretary Mr. Talabi Oke, whose recent remarks urging Calabar-based clubs to unite against Cynosure FC have drawn scrutiny. Observers note that the ban on Coach Ulor came shortly after these statements, fueling speculation that the action was politically motivated rather than disciplinary.
Several football stakeholders have voiced their unease, suggesting that the CRSFA’s move may be a deliberate attempt to influence the ongoing proceedings before the NFF Appeals Committee. Despite this, they remain confident in the committee’s integrity.
“The NFF Appeals Committee is known for its independence and professionalism,” one stakeholder remarked. “We believe it will treat the matter on its own merit, irrespective of distractions or pressure from any quarters.”
Importantly, stakeholders emphasized that the case being reviewed by the NFF Appeals Committee is separate from the CRSFA’s ruling, and therefore should not be conflated.
“This is a clear attempt to muddy the waters,” said another official. “But we are optimistic the committee will base its decision solely on the facts presented.”
Further concern has been raised over what some perceive as a targeted campaign against Cynosure FC and its chairman, potentially linked to the internal politics of the state FA. The perceived vendetta has cast doubt over the impartiality of the CRSFA’s actions.
The growing chorus of support for the NFF Appeals Committee underscores the football community’s desire for transparency, fairness, and justice. With the eyes of the football world watching, stakeholders hope that the committee’s final verdict will reaffirm these principles — free from external interference.
