In its decision to curb excesses of Refereeing officials in matches and protect/preserve the
integrity of the game, the NFF Refereeing Development Committee has sanctioned Referees and Assistant Referees whose actions and decisions are questionable have been carried out.
These are:
1. NPFL MD 9: Barau FC vs Kano Pillars FC – Anthony Eze (FCT) – Referee;
Peter Ogwu (BA) AR1; and Aduba Ngbede (FCT).
Observations: There were several infractions/incidences in the match, wherein, the decisions
of the Referee, Anthony Eze (FCT) and his two assistants were adjudged by the committee
as not in line with the provisions of the Laws of the Game. More significantly, there were
also glaring misconduct such as:
• Awarding a penalty without recourse to the Laws of the Game and the instructive
guidelines on challenges as well as penalty area incidences.
• Similarly, he ignored a clear and glaring case of penalty incidence.
Several other collaborative decisions by the trio affects not only the outcome of the game but
brought Refereeing and the integrity of the game into disrepute.
Decision: Indefinite suspension of the three field officials (Anthony Eze (FCT), Peter Ogwu
(BA) and Aduba Ngbede (FCT) from the league and all other football matches.
2. NNL MD 4: Rovers FC and Sporting Lagos FC – Ekpouko Ubong (AK) – AR1
Observations: This was an NNL MD 4 encounter between Rovers FC and Sporting Lagos
FC. The incidence emanates from a through pass switch to the right flank of play, where an unmarked attacking player was situated, having space ahead of him and proceeded towards the opponent’s goal.
As at the time the ball left the leg of his team (last touch) for a pass across, player has
defending players ahead of him at the centre of the pitch and therefore, was not in an offside position (not closer to the opponent’s goal line than both the ball and the second last opponent).
The active Assistant Referee, Ekpouko Ubong (AK) decision to penalize him for offside
offense was not in line with the provisions of the Laws of d Game and instructive guidelines on assessment of offside positioning and punishment. His decision and action denied the team an obviou goal scoring opportunity, which the
Committee viewed as having an effect on the outcome of the match. Decision: Indefinite suspension from the league and all other football matches.
3. NWFL MD 2: Remo Stars Ladies vs Abia Angels – Ernest Cynthia (OG) – AR2
Observations: This was an NWFL MD 2 encounter involving Remo Stars Ladies and Abia
Angels. It was from a free kick commenced with a pass through the right flank and a pull out. The goalkeeper punched/parry the ball back into play to an opponent who shot immediately at goal.
As at the time of the pull out, no attacking player was in an offside position.
Similarly, when the shot at goal was taken, no attacking player was in an offside position to have earned being penalized.The decision of the active Assistant Referee 2, Ernest Cynthia (OG) to penalize for offside
did not meet the requirement of offside positioning or penalizing for being in such position.
The decision/action of d active AR denied an obvious goal scored and thus, affects the outcome of the match.
Decision: Indefinite suspension from the league and every other matches.
4. NNL MD 4: Mighty Jets vs City FC – Nurah Abdullahi (ZM) – Referee
Observations: This was an NNL MD4 encounter between Mighty Jets and City FC. It was a case of challenging for the ball, where in an attacking player jumped at the goalkeeper with his entire body while his arm/elbow was placed between the jaw and chest of the goalkeeper.
This pushed/forced the goalkeeper down, and on recovery still went up for the ball but was also jumped at/pushed to record a goal.
Same scenario repeated itself and Referee, Nurah Abdullahi (ZM) ignored these actions of the attacking player against the goalkeeper of one of the teams, the action/decision of d Referee did not comply with d provisions of the Laws of the Game as he failed to protect the goalkeeper to give an undue advantage to his opponent.This action changed d outcome of the game.
Decision: Indefinite suspension from the league and every other matches.
5. NNL MD 5: Sporting Supreme FC vs Bichi FC – Ahmed M. Usman (NG) –
Referee Observations: This was an incident in the NNL MD 5 involving Sporting Supreme and Bichi FC. The Committee noted the actions of the two players (defending and attacking from their
running towards one of the teams’ goal areas. While both players were initially struggling for POSITION & POSSESSION (upper body contacts) the player in white was able to move slightly ahead but the player in black out-paced him with strides to be about one foot ahead
of d player in white. The player in white attempted a SWEEPING/SLIDING form of tackle, missed and went down. While it was the player in white who attempted/initiated to make contact, which was unsuccessful, it was him that went down.
The defending player in black is not guilty of any offense.
However, the Referee, Ahmed M. Usman (NG) awarded a penalty which was not in any way a reflection of d provision of d Laws of the game.
The Committee considered this as an arbitrary decision outside the Laws of the Game. Decision: Indefinite suspension from the league and every other matches.
6. NNL MD 5: Lobi Stars FC vs Basira FC
Observations: This was an NNL MD5 encounter between Lobi Stars FC and Basira FC
played in Lafia. There were two incidences, which are:
• Handball/award of a penalty.
• A set pieces and a header to score
As for the handball, the defending player who was penalized for handball did not only make his body unnaturally bigger but there was additional movement of his arm in the direction of the ball, which makes it a foul and a penalty. The Referee’s decision to award a penalty meets the requirement of the Laws of the Game.
On the heading and goal from set pieces/free kick, the camera did not pick/show where the scorer was when the ball left the leg of the kicker (last touch) from the set pieces. It is therefore difficult to adjudged it as OFFSIDE OR NO OFFSIDE
Decision: The Committee exonerate the match officials of any wrong doing.
7. NNL MD 5: Kada Warriors FC vs Mighty Jets FC – Michael Adepoju (FCT)
Referee
Observations: This was an NNL MD 5 encounter between Kada Warrior and Mighty Jets The attacking player in yellow came from behind the defending player to initiate normal football contact, and went down to manipulate the Referee’s decision for a penalty.
The Committee noted that there was no offense committed therefore, No Foul. The Referee’s decision to award a penalty does not meet the requirement on challenges as foul in the Laws of the Game.
Decision: Indefinite suspension from the league and every other matches.
8.NWFL MD 3: Ekiti Queens vs Edo Queens
Observations: This was an NWFL match between Ekiti Queens and Edo Queens. The nincident was an offside situation from a free kick. As at d time the ball leaves the leg of the kicker (last touch), it was not vividly clear whether the attacking player/scorer was ahead of the second last opponent or not. That should be the point of judging offside. Movement
thereafter cannot be the basis of offside In this video, the camera angle did not give a clear view on the true position of the players (defence & attack) before the kick was taken, and therefore, one will not be able to establish
if there was offside offence or not. Decision: The Committee exonerated the match officials of any wrong doing. Best of sporting regards
MOHAMMED AMEENU DLM, FIMC, FAIPA, CMC, AICEN, AMNIPR For: Chairman, NFF Refereeing Development Committee